Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in choose juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it ideal for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Deterrence: The concern of severe effects, including capital punishment, is meant to deter opportunity criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of legislation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
Petitioner read more obtaining been declared an absconder in this case for over a single and also a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution in the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions towards the rule of grant of bail as mentioned earlier mentioned.
The issue here is that an accused may perhaps say that they meant to injure the target, but they didn't plan to destroy them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars because arrest, investigation with the case is complete, he isn't any more demanded for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before summary of trial will serve no valuable purpose.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Until case is tried(Bail Matters)
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) with the Pakistan Constitution delivers authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out during the 1992 Rio Declaration within the Environment and Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.